In the last two weeks, I’ve managed to see two new musicals that each offer their own critique of the American dream — Gatsby: An American Myth, which premiered earlier this summer at the American Repertory Theatre here in Cambridge, and The Queen of Versailles, which is in its pre-Broadway run in Boston.
Gatsby: An American Myth is a musical adaptation of the classic American novel, The Great Gatsby (not to be confused with another musical adaptation, The Great Gatsby, currently showing on Broadway). In adapting F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, the musical seeks to complicate the back stories of many of the book’s main characters. The musical’s characters are each striving for the American dream in their own ways. Nick Carroway is a veteran who survived a world war and global pandemic and is now trying to survive those lingering traumas and live the American dream in New York City. George and Myrtle Wilson lost a child to the Spanish flu and now Myrtle is desperate to escape her grief and the working class existence that she believed killed her child. Jay Gatsby is trying to reinvent himself as an enigmatic millionaire, obscuring his humble Heartland roots. And Daisy is living the American dream with wealth and the perfect family, or is she?
The Queen of Versailles is a musical adaptation of the 2012 documentary of the same name. The musical follows Jackie Siegel and her husband David as they attempt to build the biggest single-family home in America, modeled off the Palace of Versailles, and navigate the 2008 financial crisis, which throws the project into jeopardy. It tells the story of Jackie’s normal childhood and early adulthood in Endwell, New York, her marriage to wealthy businessman David Siegel, and finally the ostentatious flaunting of their wealth, culminating in their still incomplete project to build their very own Versailles.
The musicals trace the rise and fall of their over-the-top main characters from humble beginnings to extravagant and outlandish wealth and finally to sad, lonely endings. In Act Two of The Queen of Versailles, Jackie’s daughter dies of an overdose, and while Jackie mourns the loss of her daughter, she also immediately pivots to how she can make more money off of the tragedy and how they can get their house project back on track. In Gatsby: An American Myth as in the novel itself, the show ends in tragedy — Myrtle, George, and Gatsby dead, their friends scattered.
Both shows end with similar scenes in sad, empty mansions: in the closing scene of Gatsby, Jay Gatsby is dead, no one came to his funeral, and the house that hosted his lavish parties sits vacant. In the final moments of The Queen of Versailles, Jackie is all alone in her still unfinished Versailles, her husband busy working, her daughter dead, her other children away at college. The huge unfinished house with her alone in it.
Gatsby and the Siegels amassed all that wealth and power and yet to what end? They were always striving for more, for the American dream of making it big and breaking out of their social class, but at what cost?
I left each show with the distinct feeling that when it comes to the American dream, no one really wins. You really don’t end up rooting for any of the characters and are left feeling a little depressed about the sad ways they lived their lives. In fact, you’re left feeling that the American dream might be a myth, an absurd and laughable farce.
There’s a line near the end of Gatsby that has stuck with me. I can’t quite remember the exact quote but as one of the characters observes Gatsby’s empty mansion he exclaims, “This place is haunted!” He then quickly corrects himself: it’s not just the house that’s haunted, America is haunted, this whole country is haunted!
Certainly, both shows are making a statement that the American dream might be cursed. Rather than offering a happy, triumphant, or uplifting ending, they force the audience to sit with that unsettled feeling.
Thanks Allison. This reminds me of a great NY Times article a few weeks ago entitled “Are We Happy Yet?” These plays and that article both drove me back to Jesus’ talk of finally “finding our life” when we lose it for him and a greater kingdom. I love it when that message is revealed through non-religious sources like plays and scientific studies.
Great reflection on the Great Gatsby. Makes me want to read it again. I always read your posts.
Every ti
I read one of your posts I think “she’s spent too much time in school”.
If you think that’s what the American dream is, you’re been poorly taught.
Please explain, Tom.
Two comments today:
1. I taught American Political and Social History at Calvin for 36 years. I taught two generations of Calvin students that “The American Dream” was out of reach for many people because of race and gender matters (ask Jim Bratt, Joel Carpemter and Leanne Van Dyke and others about that). I get it.
2. But, the American dream was, and is, attainable for many (White) folks. My parents crossed
the border at Vanceboro, Maine about a century ago. They were working class, which means they worked long hours at repentative jobs and received mediocre pay. My Dad often had an extra job. But they moved to a town with a great school system, which propelled my brother and I into success in higher education. Both of us earned PhDs. If you could have asked my parents at the ends of their lives if their stuggle was worth it, they’d say a resounding “yes, ” and join in singing God Bless America. At the same time, they were not fooled that America was open to all — it wasn’t and isn’t. That’s why the encouraged me to join the Civil Rights Movement, and go to march behind Dr. King. Ask Dr. King about what he was marching for….
Ron, for generations Calvin College Professors have perpetuated “white privilege”. The children of Calvin College/University Professors can attend Calvin for 4 years at no cost. When these Professors denounce this privilege, then can I believe that they are concerned for fighting for the interests of the poor, marginalized and minorities.
I ask you to check your facts. I don’t know what the policy is now, but that was not true in my time. We paid like everyone else. In any case, neither of my sons attended Calvin College. And, by the way, I taught students to think for themselves, as a liberal arts education does. I did not “fight” for or against anything.
Yes, Calvin University does offer free tuition for the children of professors and also some full time staff and has been for many years. I’m sure readers of this blog will correct me if this is not happening.
This seems like a fair and creative form of compensation to me. College professors are some of the most poorly compensated professional groups in our society, given their years of education and ongoing research requirements. I have taken or lectured classes at many different universities. Calvin profs are clearly at the top.The depth of their scholarship and the balanced integration of kingdom-of-God theology is inspiring. My experience is first-hand. The witness and governance of the church would be so much better if we focused on how to think rather than what to think.