Sorting by

×
Skip to main content

“You need to work on your identity crisis at a different institution.” With those words Dean Boender sent me packing. 

It was 1979, I was a sophomore at Calvin College, and the good Dean wasn’t wrong. Majoring in general knuckle-headedness, I had no idea what I was doing as a college student.  So, after a year and a half at Calvin, I limped home. Defeated. 

I left Calvin feeling like I wasn’t good enough, smart enough, or faithful enough. As a public-school kid, who wasn’t Dutch, I was already an outsider. Not succeeding as a student reinforced that reality. And therefore, while I made good friends, loved the campus culture, and wanted to succeed, I left knowing that I’d failed. 

It takes a long time to shed the weight of failure. Those sorts of experiences help create self-defining knots and narratives. And while this is not the setting to unspool that story, I’ve revisited it recently. 

At a 2024 meeting, Classis Chicago South of the Christian Reformed Church received an overture charging any support of same-sex marriage as a “first tier” heresy – likened unto denying the divinity of Jesus Christ. When I asked about the implications for those who would be deemed heretics, I was told that I would need to “change or leave.” 

That heresy overture didn’t make it out of Classis. However, the decisions of the recent Christian Reformed Synod made it clear that unless I rescind my statement of conscience, repent of my flawed biblical interpretation, and submit to a three-year discipleship process in order to be changed, I am no longer welcome.  Because I think how we love our same-sex-oriented brothers and sisters is a matter of pastoral care and not one of confessional or salvific weight, I’m being sent packing. I’m not good enough, smart enough, or faithful enough to continue serving in the CRCNA. This current “messy reformation” of the church requires that I work on my identity crisis at a different institution. 

Clearly these two events are not the same. They’re as different as being 19 years old and being 65 years old. But on both occasions, I failed to meet the standards. On both occasions, I was longer acceptable. On both occasions, I was told to change or leave. 

After leaving Calvin College, I graduated from Northwestern College and Western Theological Seminary. In the early 1980s, I served as an intern at Roseland Christian Ministries in Chicago. And in some fashion, I’ve remained rooted at RCM ever since. For 10 years I taught, coached, and was a chaplain at two Christian high schools, and for the past 22 years I’ve pastored Hope Christian Reformed Church in Oak Forest, Illinois. My vocational identity has been shaped in CRCNA settings. 

Dean Boender sent me down a healthier path. I needed to leave Calvin College. The mistakes I made were mine alone and how I carried that “failure” is on me. Sometimes growth requires a new address. Sometimes identity formation is a long bumpy journey. The Dean had my best interests in mind. Even as I left his office – wondering how I would tell my parents – I thought we were on the same team and pulling in the same direction. 

This is where the analogy falls apart. It could be that the CRCNA is the one going through an identity transition. And yet, for the life of me, I can’t fathom how forcing out the faithful witness of pastors and congregations who welcome the queer community strengthens the church. This will end with church splits and broken fellowship. Some will leave, some will stay, and some will get sent packing. And there will be long bumpy roads to new identities.   

Our identity as Reformed Christians requires a measure of confessional uniformity about how we love and serve God and neighbor. But, if it rules out disagreement and puts a time limit on discussion, if we can’t faithfully serve while carrying doubts and difficulties, then I do need to work on my identity crisis at a different institution. 

I’ve met a remarkable collection of Christian Reformed pastors who are wondering if they can remain in the denomination that they’ve loved and in which they’ve been formed. I’ve been struck by their giftedness and their desire to faithfully serve the church of Christ. My prayer is that they won’t long carry the wounds of being told that they’re not good enough, faithful enough, or acceptable enough. My prayer is that they and the congregations they serve will know that they are loved and accepted by God in Christ – without exception. We may need to change addresses, but our identity is unshakable. As the Heidelberg Catechism puts it, 

I believe that the Son of God through his Spirit and his Word, out of the entire human race, from the beginning of the world to its end, gathers, protects, and preserves for himself a community chosen for eternal life and united in true faith. And of this community I am and always will be a living member.

Lord’s Day 21, Q&A 54

The sting of rejection always hurts. Dean Boender gave me the boot for good reason. My late-adolescent-attention-deficit-issues impacted my ability to be a student. However, to be sent packing at age 65 because of an interpretative disagreement over a handful of passages and the contours of an ethic of love is grievous. But maybe I’m just collateral damage in this movement toward a new identity.



Header photo by Kelly on Pexels

Roger Nelson

Roger Nelson has been the pastor of Hope Christian Reformed Church in Oak Forest, Illinois, for 22 years. He’s a husband, father, grandfather and the author of Listening for the Voice: Collected Sermons and Reflections on Preaching published by Broken Spoke Books.

24 Comments

  • Nate DeJong-McCarron says:

    Thank you, Rog.

  • James C Dekker says:

    Thanks. Amen. Courage. Blessings. Prayers.

  • Daniel Walcott says:

    Roger,
    Thanks for writing, for expressing what so many are feeling.

  • Daniel Meeter says:

    This is beginning to remind me of what the Brits call “The Great Ejection” of 1662, when several thousand Puritan and Presbyterian pastors were summarily kicked out of the Church of England after the Restoration of that miserable King Charles the Second. Would you believe that it took centuries for the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams by name, to offer an acknowledgment and apology?

  • Jan Zuidema says:

    This remains out of my comprehension. This ‘believe/interpret exactly like us or leave’ is such a stunning reflection of the culture that the purists think they are ridding themselves of. No, they have adopted the extreme hubris of our times that would limit books, history, access to health care, and even who we welcome, be it immigrant or friend, leaving our denomination in chaos. Even though it will be too late for many, I am hoping that those left soon realize that perhaps the cost of this purity is too high. I believe I can say that I, as well as many others, are praying for you and all of those who are being shown the door, as well as those who love and value you in your churches. Again, God have mercy.

  • Taylor W Holbrook says:

    Thanks Rog, you are beloved.

  • Harold Gazan says:

    You have provided readers with a powerful, personal statement that I hope will be of encouragement to other faithful Christians who have been placed in a most difficult situation by the action taken by CRCNA.

  • Steven Tryon says:

    Thank you. Q&A 54 has, in these past few years, become at least as precious to me as Q&A 1.

  • Henry Baron says:

    Thank you for the blessing of sharing your story with us – it’s a sad one and yet a hopeful one that our “rejection” will more faithfully shape and enrich our “new” identity.

  • Douglas MacLeod says:

    Indeed. Thank you for saying this so clearly.

  • Gretchen Schoon Tanis says:

    Sheesh – this all seems very shortsighted. I’d take you on my team any day! Churches will miss out on some great team members as this goes along. Grace for the road ahead.

  • Al Mulder says:

    Without denying the pain the negative witness the CRCNA Synod his spreading around, the “bettet” is yet to come, Roger. In the ‘not yet’ and in the yet to come.

  • Carol DeJong says:

    Rog, my heart bleeds for you, for Hope Church, and the CRCNA.

  • James Vanden Bosch says:

    Excellent statement, Roger. The majority in the last few synods could have taken their victories in very different directions, because some things are too important for a vote, and our status as fellow Christians in this Reformed community cannot be decided by a majority. We are not saved by doctrines or by institutional “purity,” and the day will come when that majority decision will satisfy no one.

  • Steve Bellin says:

    Thanks Rog. I.have been a member of Hope
    CRC since 1970. We have experienced many challenges over the years and we will find the right path for all of us together. I and many others stand with you and look to the future.

  • Jeff Carpenter says:

    Roger: thanks for being my pastor for at least 22 years, for performing marriages and baptisms among my family, for encouragement and shared leadership during my several terms on council, for a handful of years as a Christian high school colleague, and for decades of friendship. I say these personal things in a public forum as a demonstration that my experience is just one of hundreds of church members, colleagues, students whose lives and faith and purpose have all been affected and influenced by your good and kind and faithful witness and service and love..Multiply that by the numbers of other ministers and agency personnel and fellow travellers whose service and fellowship has been strained and cut off, with the same ensuing ripple effect throughout congregations and communities. At the same time, identity crisis also is the opportunity to reassess identity. I just hope our end result and determination is yet again a positive one.

  • Willemiena Dykhouse McCarron says:

    Thank you, Roger. Q&A 1 and Q&A 54 are my two favorites. Your article is powerful.

  • Jesus had a bad reputation according to the establishment of his day. He didn’t just talk with those who the “church” and society shunned, he, horror of horrors, he sat down and ate (think communion) with them, let them know they are loved and gave them hope.

  • Jill Feikema says:

    Your perseverance in the face of many obstacles (including the recent ones) is a testimony to your witness as a child of God. While you were “booted” in the first experience, it informed who you were as a pastor, mentor and teacher as a faithful servant to a persistent calling. God used all of it to enrich your ministry and to bring you where you are today. And in the second booting, our CRCNA world is smaller becasue of your and Hope’s departure — however the world beyond the doors of the CRC needs your voice and your experiences. Thank you for sticking with the greatest calling of all.

  • Darrell Bierman says:

    Thank you Roger. What you share here really resonates with me. Strength & Peace. Darrell

  • Steven Timmermans says:

    Thank you, Roger. The coming departures of congregations–their members and pastors–triggers all kinds of identify issues among us. God’s adoption of us as sons and daughters gives us our true identities, but being pushed out of the CRC is a painful way to try to obscure our true reflection of God’s image in us.

  • Joy Engelsman says:

    Thank you for this encouraging writing, Roger. And for the reminder of HC 54.

  • Ronald Hofman says:

    The decision of Don Boender was nurturing and it opened the doors to all your next steps. The Synodical decision nurtures no one but prods those of us shaped generationally by CRC to next steps. May these next steps be as good as yours Rog.

Leave a Reply