Wisdom is absent from Reformed theology. We don’t talk about it. I wonder why.
Two Sundays ago we worshipped at the Holy Cross Monastery, where we often go. The Superior gave the sermon. His sermon was calm, quiet, and reflective, not to mention gently challenging. It was wise. It struck me that this monastery has become for me a place of wisdom.
As I drove home. I wondered if it had to do with Benedictine spirituality, with their practices of silence, patient prayer, humility, and hospitality. I suspect their disciplines generate a collective wisdom. Their incredible tradition gives them experience, knowledge, and a calm and hospitable confidence.
In Dostoyevsky’s Brother Karamazov it is the monk Father Zosima who is the wise man. His wisdom comes from his spirituality. But in George Eliot’s Middlemarch the wise man is Caleb Garth, not one of the clergy. His wisdom comes from being rooted and grounded.
I drove home through the very hip village of Rosendale, where the old brick Dutch Reformed building is for sale again. I fantasized about buying it and planting a church called Saint Wisdom’s. Would Wisdom attract this jaded population? And that’s when I noticed the absence of Wisdom from Reformed theology. I can’t think of it coming up in our Doctrinal Standards, or even in the Creeds.
“Where is wisdom to be found?” It’s not what we look for in church planters. Winning personalities, yes, but we train them for leadership, energy, and entrepreneurship. I checked for Wisdom in the mission statements of our seminaries. Nope. How about the mission statements of our colleges? Nope. Or of any of the churches that I have served, whose mission statements I have written? Nope. The cultivation of wisdom is not part of our mission.
I have been reading Eliza Griswold’s new book Circle of Hope, about the self-destruction of a remarkable church in Philadelphia. A tragically hip church, Christ-centered, passionate, creative, and dedicated to justice, peace, and anti-racism. But I noticed the lack of wisdom in the story. Not that I showed any more wisdom in the conventional churches that I have led. What wisdom we had was in those older saints for whom I was always grateful.
I have read one book on the Wisdom Literature of the Bible, and that’s only because I was culling my shelves before retirement. I’d been looking at the spine of Wisdom in Israel by Gerhard von Rad for decades and I finally pulled it down. Von Rad was the great Pentateuch scholar, and no one had expected him to write his last book on a second-rate part of the Bible. Not even von Rad could make that literature feel first-class to me. Sometimes the Wisdom books seem, well, so dumb.
I mentioned my musings to Melody (wisdom being her job in our marriage). She pointed out that Wisdom does come up in feminist theology. Good point. And then she mentioned “Lady Wisdom” from Proverbs. Some writers argue that Lady Wisdom was an early foundation of Christology. I am not convinced by the evidence, and I think it’s better to follow the tradition and assign the personification of wisdom to the Holy Spirit—she is Lady Wisdom.
So maybe the relative weakness of Pneumatology in Reformed theology is partly why Wisdom is absent. And when we do pay attention to the Holy Spirit we tend to look for signs and manifestations that are the opposite of Wisdom—power, baby, power. Against which St. Paul warns us in First Corinthians.
That’s the same epistle in which he sings of love. There must be a connection between wisdom and love. Which reminds me of another absence in Reformed theology—the absence of Love from our Church Orders. They do not say, for example, that the first job of a synod is to love its classes, or that the first job of pastors is to love their churches. Nor do they say that the second job of synods is wisdom.
This past Sunday at Holy Cross the Assistant Superior preached. Another wise sermon, on the text, the Great Commandment to love, and nothing about the election. How many elections have the Benedictines lived through, how many dictators, how many wars and emperors and revolutions? St. Benedict wrote his Rule the same year as the “fall” of Rome, which nobody noticed when it fell. Doubtless the great age of the Benedictine movement contributes to the wisdom that I feel from them on Sunday mornings.
My wondering about the absence of wisdom is sincere, and not just rhetorical. My intention is not judgmental. But now three days after the election, this miserable USA is desperate for wisdom, and should this not be part of the mission of the church? If so, we’d better start working on it ourselves.
I love this very much, Daniel! It’s thought provoking and comforting at the same time. I am preaching this coming Sunday at my husband’s care center. I’m not planning on mentioning the election at all. And your words erased any question I may have held about the wisdom of that. Thank you.
You’re welcome, dear heart.
❤️
This was really good. Thanks, Daniel.
Sometimes when I hear a familiar passage preached by someone from outside our tradition I am surprised where they see evidence of God’s love and grace in it. That is also a reflection of the tradition that has shaped me. It is so good to hear voices from the wider church.
Was reading some NT Wright on John’s Prologue the other day- he thinks that Proverbs’ Lady Wisdom is one of the layers of meaning the text is echoing in Jn 1.1-14…
…anywho…
A thoughtful article, my friend. The lack of any presence or reference to Wisdom in the significant texts of our tradition is indeed striking…
Ja, I think that is one of N T Wrights blunders. Mere speculation. He can’t show any documentary evidence. Another blunder is his “life after life after death.”
Lady Wisdom on a par with the Logos, is not so far-fetched Daniel. Both are alongside of the Creator in creation. Just an observation.
Would that not be the Holy Spirit?
Thank you Daniel. This is a helpful reflection. During many of my years as a pastor at Fellowship Reformed Church, I had the gift of Dr. Robert Coughenour in the congregation. Wisdom literature was his specialty. He thought that we had missed the mark by talking about only the three officers of Jesus. He thought that we could better speak of Jesus as Prophet, Priest, King, and Sage! I always found that thought compelling.
There you go! He was a remarkable man. Thank you for reminding me of him.
I too value Bob. He is living in Florida now near his daughter.
That’s right! I remember him talking about that too, Ken
Thank you for this Daniel. HCM is a blessed place, I’m ever so curious about what God is doing through its ministry and deeper ties to those of us who find refuge and restoration there?
Let’s have our first Middle Assembly retreat there One of the Brothers knows about the Reformed Church. Maybe we could invite Wes G-M to lead us.
That would be a great idea! CP&F may be able to help with the cost. 😉
Sounds like a great idea!
The Psalmist writes that “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” So if we are lacking wisdom, or fail to seek it, is it because we have failed the first part?
I like it.
Wisdom exists and wisdom people are active. My ministry often brought me into personal and even national disasters. In chaotic situations I always looked for and found these allies of shalom. Thank you for this wonderful reminder of an often overlooked reality that gives hope for our tomorrows.
Just finished Brian McLaren’s LIFE AFTER DOOM, a reflection on Climate disaster. At the end, he reflects on the absence of wisdom and its causes:
1. Confirmation bias: We hold our framing truth so tightly we seek confirmation and never reach transformation.
2. Complexity bias: The human brain generally prefers a simple lie to a complex truth (Biblical truth is usually complex.)
This was a valuable reflection, Daniel.
Thanks for an encouraging and challenging reflection, appropriate as we adjust to a new reality requiring much wisdom. I was reminded again of an elder/apple grower in our first congregation.. Sjouke, after a long debate in council on a difficult matter 48 years ago, would tilt his plywood/tubular chair back and ask, “Gentlemen, I know it’s right, but is it wise?”……..sending us back to reflect differently. His phrase has guided my ministry frequently….hopefully!
What a profoundly helpful and important question for us to ask.
Thanks, Daniel, for reminding us of our need for wisdom and love. May it guide us as we practice it in our worship, in our interactions with those we love and with whom we disagree, and in many a difficult decision we will face.
I have often remarked that the monks are the strong, steady center that holds the Roman Catholic Church together, if not the universe.
We lost much wisdom when we turned away from monasticism. We need Reformed monastics who understand silence, solitude, and prayer.
Thank you for sharing your wisdom with us, Daniel. These are important wonderings.
I wonder if the Heidelberg’s section on the ten commandments gives us a model for wisdom, meditating on God’s law and becoming, like the Psalmist, wise as we do so.
We can certainly take it that way.
You could call your church Santa Sofia.
Oh yes, that had occurred to me. Or Hagia Sophia. Or even Santa Donna Sofia.
Thanks Dan. This kind of thoughtful reflection goes so far beyond positional posturing. It’s the kind of antidote to polarization which reminds us of the need for healthy tension, pushing and pulling that might even become never-ending wrestling worthy of honest to God Israelites. The fact that the word “wisdom” is not really found in our confessions reminded me of the terrific line from Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the movie–when confronted with the fact that the word “woman” was not found in the Constitution, she noted that neither is the word “freedom.”
This is a very thoughtful article about the lack of emphasis on the wisdom tradition of the protestant church over the ages. While I would agree that this omission exists, I see it rather as being intentional than as accidental.
My understanding of the wisdom movement in the Christian tradition is that it began by sitting in the desert on a pillar contemplating the inner struggle of conquering instincts that were pulling us away from following Christ. It was a movement of personal inward struggle to control the darkest parts of our selves for Christ.
If my understanding of the wisdom movement is correct, even if only partial, it leaves me with a feeling of incompleteness. There is a world out their crying for answers to the larger questions of life. As Christians we need to be in the public square taking on Christian nationalism, prejudice, misogynism, disrespectful treatment of others, justice, fairness in the treatment of the widow, the fatherless and the strangers at the gate. Admittedly, these are messy and complex issues but they are begging for light to be brought to the table of public discussion. In all fairness, as much as this article appeals to me, it reminds me of the mega church I just read about. It could not see its way forward through the congregation’s political divisions so it took the motto, “to be nice”.
I believe that while there is a place for the message to “be nice” and there is a place for the Christian to turn inward and focus on their inner journey, I feel there are larger issues of far greater importance that are crying for our participation in the public square. While we may not have “a Chistian” answer in times of political crisis, our basic values and instincts are still needed to bring light and salt to this messy world for Christ’s sake. My understanding is that the call of Christ in more outward after the inner work of the spirit has begun his work.
Thanks for the thoughtful article.
It never occurred to me that Wisdom and Love are not mentioned in our Creeds, Orders, and Standards. Perhaps this is why I so often struggle to feel that my training and work as a spiritual director can be integrated with my Reformed Church world.
Ah, thanks for this, Daniel. Well said. Thank you for finding and modeling ways to be present in this big mystery – truly the path of wisdom.