Sorting by

×
Skip to main content

In January. Steve Mathonnet-VanderWell posted a blog in this space called Joe Biden’s Age, arguing that Biden’s age helped make him trustworthy. The months since have shown Steve’s to be a minority view.

At the time, I wrote a piece countering Steve’s argument, saying Biden’s age was his greatest liability, not an asset. My point, though, was that the problem wasn’t just Biden’s age. It was how he wore it, his painstaking way of walking and trouble communicating. Some of our more faithful readers may be saying to themselves, “I don’t remember seeing that.” You are correct. I never posted it. Steve’s my Reformed Journal partner and I didn’t feel great about publicly disagreeing with him. On top of that, as I reread my article, I thought it sounded like it could have been written by Karl Rove. Way back in January, the vultures were already circling, and I didn’t want to pile on.

Perhaps it was age-ism on my part to say Biden’s age was a liability. I’m not sure. I did appreciate recently seeing a comment from George W. Bush when the election looked like it was going to be a replay of 2020: “I’m younger than both of the candidates, and I’m too old.” There are jobs—air traffic controller, submarine captain, steeplejack—that should not be done by people in their 80s. Shouldn’t leader of the free world be on that list?

As for Steve’s original argument that age brings wisdom and trustworthiness, I’d point out the Republican nominee is 78 and does not demonstrate either of those traits. I think T.S. Eliot may have had that man in mind when he wrote about “having the experience but missing the meaning.”

But enough about he who must not be named. I am not interested in him. I want to say a few words instead about Joe Biden.

Frederick Buechner’s concept of “the stewardship of pain” has been a guiding concept in my life and is the thread that runs through my book Telling Stories in the Dark. Biden has been a good steward of his pain. He’s known great pain, from the tragic loss of his first wife Neilia and their one-year-old daughter Naomi in a traffic accident in 1972, to the loss of his son Beau in 2015. Joe Biden has taken these losses into his being—he hasn’t buried the pain or gotten stuck in it. I begin Telling Stories in the Dark with a quote from Richard Rohr: “If we do not transform our pain, we will surely transmit it.” Joe Biden has transformed his pain into compassion and empathy.

Perhaps the greatest gifts Joe Biden has given America are his normalcy and decency, which stem from his emotional health. The United States has experienced what it is like to have an emotionally unhealthy leader. Every time I hear someone on the campaign trail ask, “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?” I say “Yes” enthusiastically. I don’t care that the price of gasoline is higher today than in 2020. Do you remember the chaos of 2017 – 2021? I worry we have collective amnesia. We had a global pandemic and a leader who did not rise to the challenge. He denied it’s reality, called it a Democratic hoax, recommended unproven treatments, did not listen to his health advisors, and finally just blamed China. We had a foreign policy bent on alienating traditional allies and cozying up to authoritarian strongmen. We had constant churning in key positions (including four chiefs of staff). One chart I’ve seen says the turnover rate in key positions in the previous administration was the highest in history, at 92%. And never forget that a mob of the former president’s supporters wanted to hang the vice president on January 6, 2021. The chaos was exhausting.

Biden is not exhausting. He’s level. Humane. Genuine. The chaos is still around, flaring up in culture warriors like those behind Project 2025 and, locally, in Ottawa Impact. And chaos comes out every time Marjorie Taylor Greene opens her mouth. Yet when I drive around and see “F*#% Joe Biden” signs, I’m triggered to say a little prayer thanking God for giving us such a decent man, better than we deserve.

Last month, Joe Biden proved his decency yet again, by putting the needs of the nation in front of his ego. By stepping out of the race, he made himself a lame duck four months before the election and in many senses prematurely ended his presidency—although he pulled off a stunning diplomatic move in getting several nations to cooperate to bring a number of political prisoners out of Russia and his move did give him the freedom to propose a series of Supreme Court reforms which should be seriously considered. Biden swallowed his pride and got out of the way of the next generation of leaders.

(To those who say his move was unconstitutional, all you’re doing when you say that is demonstrating a lack of knowledge about what’s actually in the Constitution. Not only is it mute about primary elections, the Constitution doesn’t even have provisions for a popular vote.)

Biden’s move is reminiscent of George Washington refusing to run for a third term because it would not be good for the nation. At the time, Washington identified three threats: regionalism, partisanship, and foreign entanglements. Washington did not have the ability to identify racism as a threat, but it is fair to say America’s Civil War was related to regionalism. Partisanship is worse than ever, and foreign nations are trying to influence our elections. Over two hundred years since the time of Washington, the threats are still real. I would add the distortion of religion known as Christian Nationalism and the existential threat posed by the climate crisis to the list.

There will never be a day when we arrive and can say, “We’ve made it.” But thank God for the normalcy and decency of the past four years. In the final analysis, it’s not Joe Biden’s age that mattered. It’s that we lived in the age of Joe Biden.

Jeff Munroe

Jeff Munroe is the editor of the Reformed Journal. 

21 Comments

  • Lisa Vander Wal says:

    Thank you, Jeff!

  • Rowland Van Es, Jr says:

    I agree wholeheartedly that Biden was a decent man who did the honorable and patriotic thing. The right question to ask is, “Are we as a country better off today than we were four years ago?” And the answer is YES! I hope and pray that we are not going back to the chaotic past but rather forward into a bright new future.

  • Barbara J. Hampton says:

    Amen!

  • Jan Zuidema says:

    Thank you for giving him the praise that is due. May we never sink back into idiocy again.

  • George Bruins says:

    How convenient! Why print common sense when it might interfere with the cause or offend fellow believers?

    • Rodney Haveman says:

      I don’t know what this means?

      • George Bruins says:

        Rodney,
        Jeff chose not to print his first response for fear of offending Steve.
        Jeff did print his second response, which included this common sense observation:
        “There are jobs—air traffic controller, submarine captain, steeplejack—that should not be done by people in their 80s. Shouldn’t leader of the free world be on that list?”
        He then goes on with effusive praise for Joe Biden, presumably to blunt the audacity of acknowledging that age makes a difference. (I would add: not numerical age, but physical or mental decline.)
        My concern regards self-censorship in a group with a monolithic viewpoint. It’s unfortunate that no one would be willing to acknowledge Biden’s decline until it became impossible to conceal.
        I hope this clarifies my note.

  • Harold Gazan says:

    This is a well stated description of the character of President Joe Biden and of the tragic indecency and amoral values of the most recent former president.

  • Henry Baron says:

    Thanks, Jeff! You speak for a lot of us.

  • John Haas says:

    Well said!

  • Jean Scott says:

    Well said, Jeff. Thank-you!

  • Lynne says:

    So reassuring there’s still hope for our country. Thank you

  • Mary Jo Liesch says:

    It is so refreshing to read honest political commentary from a Christian point of view that does not make me grit my teeth! I’m so thankful for all of Reformed Journal!

  • Jack Ridl says:

    Is there a way to get this to Biden?
    Thank you, Jeff.

    I wish he could have been in your book, one of the most important, most humane books I would say ever.

  • Tom says:

    OK, so I get that Joe Biden may be more ‘decent’ than Donald Trump, but that’s a pretty low bar. Honestly, if you read the following about Donald Trump, how would you react?
    + that years after his wife and daughter were tragically killed in an accident in which she was clearly determined to be at fault, he felt the need to embellish the tragic story by implying that the truck driver that struck her car was drunk (he wasn’t); further, that he continued to tell the story even after the driver’s family contacted him and begged him to correct that record (see “Joe Biden, Salesman” in the December 2010 issue of The Atlantic).
    + that he plagiarized frequently, both in law school and in campaign speeches, even adopting parts of Neil Kinnock’s life story, claiming to come from a family of coal miners (Neil Kinnock did; Joe Biden didn’t).
    + that he “coddled the reputations of segregationist people who if they had their way, I would literally not be standing here as a member of the United States Senate” (Kamala Harris).
    + that his family made millions of dollars purely based on his powerful position.
    This is NOT a defense of Trump. I ain’t voting for him. But, really, if this guy was an old classmate, or your troublesome brother-in-law, or anyone you knew, you would not describe him as decent, genuine, humane.

    • Sheryl Lyn Mulder says:

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/driver-in-biden-crash-wanted-name-cleared/
      I am unable to pull the Atlantic article you mentioned because I don’t have a subscription. Did you read that article? Or is your source something that quotes the article?
      I appreciate knowing the other sources for your claims. I did review a cbs news report that provided details about the crash that killed Biden’s first wife and daughter. CBS admitted that they and other media outlets had reported drinking as a cause previously. In this article they state that Biden seemed to indicate alcohol involvement 2 times in the past. Interestingly there is no existing police report. No reason why. There is a judge who had investigated the case and has been asked about it, perhaps in light of the claims, and he said no drinking was involved. This article also states that Joe Biden after making the claim, now accepts the fact that alcohol was not involved. I am not sure I have ever heard Donald Trump admit he was wrong about anything he has said in the past. So what do we know and what do we not know? Was Joe Biden really trying to maliciously lie about this? Or could it be he did not have a full picture, just like CBS did not have it and made claims about it being alcohol without full knowledge without validating the claims? I don’t think we can know. Do politicians, like Joe Biden, exaggerate or fail to provide full context, etc? I believe they do. We are a world that wants soundbites and not long explanations. But I am more curious about why you felt it important to share this? Perhaps the message is that we need to all take care not to “worship” or put any president or presidential candidate on a pedestal? There is enough blame and mistakes on all sides, but we must still use our hearts and minds to try to stay informed and make the best choices we can. And pray about it as well.

      • Tom says:

        Sheryl,
        Not sure if you’ll ever see this – I’m not generally in the habit of circling back to these, but happened across your comment by accident.

        I used to subscribe to The Atlantic, but no more, so I don’t have access to the full article. The relevant paragraph follows, as quoted elsewhere:

        “For many years, he described the driver of the truck that struck and killed his first wife and their daughter in December 1972 as drunk, which he apparently was not. The tale could hardly be more tragic; why add in a baseless charge? The family of the truck driver has labored to correct the record, but Biden made the reference to drunkenness as recently as 2007, needlessly resurrecting a false and painful accusation.”

        I suppose a source like CBS news is hesitant to report it as fact because in an age before everything said is captured by someone’s phone, you have to dig a lot harder to find out what people said. I assume The Atlantic is a pretty reliable source.

        I expect Biden was embellishing the story to make himself look better (otherwise known as lying), an aspect of his personality that’s not much different than Trump. A few examples:
        + he’s claimed he was arrested in South Africa while attempting to visit Nelson Mandela in prison. (He wasn’t).
        + he’s claimed he was arrested for participating in a civil rights march.
        + etc. – do a little Googling for other examples.

        My point is not to say that no one should have voted for or supported Biden for president, or that Trump does not deserve the criticism he gets. My point is that writers on this blog consistently point out that evangelicals who support Trump have lost their way because he is a lying, indecent snake; yet, anything written about Biden (or Harris – her political career was launched by Willie Brown, with whom was carrying on an affair while he was married; she twice voted against a bill requiring medical care for a baby born alive in a botched abortion) is always laudatory.

        Makes it hard to take the Trump criticism seriously. Go ahead, advocate for the candidate that leans your way on the issues – hold your nose and vote, as I frequently do – but don’t try to paint them to me as some sort of saint when it’s well-known that they are not.

        • Sheryl Lyn Mulder says:

          Tom, I appreciate understanding the background on this. I concur that Biden and Trump have lied. But I still feel you are making a lot of assumptions and simply “googling” for examples do not mean you have found a valid source. We all have to trust sources but also look at them critically. I personally appreciate the fact checking sites.
          https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-lie-wife-killed-drunk-driver/

          Again, they state there have only been 2 instances where Biden made this assumption and none of them were as late as 2017, which you claim. You did not share where you got this “fact.”

          I think why it is hard sometimes to take a reply like yours is not so much that there is not truth that “both sides lie” and “no candidate is perfect.” But at the end of the day, at least for me, I would take the candidate that did not try to lie to the American people that he really won the election and I would take the candidate who did not do everything he could to overturn the legitimate election of President Biden. So sometimes the attempts to try to make them both seem equal feel a bit off the mark at this point in our history and political state.

          • Tom says:

            Well, I apologize for not building an ironclad case – I’m not a prosecting attorney and I guess I don’t quite have enough time in my life to exhaustively chase down every source to confirm absolute truthfulness. I guess I figure The Atlantic is a pretty reliable source with strong editorial processes in place, so I can generally trust them on the facts even if I occasionally disagree with their opinions. I trust them much more than I’d trust Snopes.

            Even so – regardless how often or for how long Biden claimed that his wife was killed by a drunk driver, all to make himself a more sympathetic (and electable) character, even if he said it only once it is a despicable and indecent act.

            And to address your last paragraph, I’ll say for third time because you don’t seem to understand – I’m am NOT defending Donald Trump in any way! Just pointing out that writers on this blog seem blind to the faults of any candidate that aligns with their view.

            By the way, going back to Deb Reinstra’s adoration of Kamala Harris a few weeks ago, I’ll just restate: she’s a bad candidate and I expect she’ll lose, thus saddling us with another four years of Donald Trump and all the associated chaos (which will unfortunately include even more unhinged opinions on this blog).

        • Sheryl Lyn Mulder says:

          Actually I didn’t think you were supporting Trump, Tom. My best guess is you voted for him before but can’t again. But you also can’t see yourself voting for a Democrat which understandably causes you grief and anger. The way you choose to express that is to point out what you feel is uncritical support for a Democratic president. But I think I have said before that just because a blog post doesn’t point out negatives about a candidate they support, does not mean the blogger does not see those imperfect parts. I also wonder why you don’t share your last name. It’s easy to criticize people in secret but harder when we allow ourselves to know and be known by those we interact with.

Leave a Reply